Turn carbon claims into accountable artifacts

Governance infrastructure

Carbon reporting fails when governance is fragmented.

Spreadsheets, local processes, and disconnected supplier evidence cannot support multi-region disclosure obligations.

Fig 1.A — Regional governance map
01

Data scattered across entities

Energy, procurement, and facilities data live in silos with no shared taxonomy or ownership model.

02

Regional disclosure without control

Central teams lack visibility into regional reporting workflows, approvals, and audit trails.

03

Supplier evidence without standards

Scope 3 claims depend on inconsistent documentation and unverified supplier submissions.

Operating model

A controlled system for measurement, accountability, and disclosure

Sustainability reporting as an operational system not an annual communications exercise.

Fig 2.A — Deployment sequence
01

Foundation Audit

Map data sources, reporting obligations, owners, and gaps.

02

Governance Design

Establish taxonomies, permissions, approval rules, and regional standards.

03

System Deployment

Connect source systems, migrate records, and configure reporting workflows.

04

Operational Scale

Expand across entities, regions, suppliers, and new regulatory requirements.

Platform

What we offer

Infrastructure for enterprise carbon governance.

  • Scope 1, 2, and 3 reporting workflows

  • Supplier evidence collection

  • Regional disclosure templates

  • Audit-ready approval trails

  • Role-based governance

  • Target tracking

  • ERP, procurement, and facilities integrations

Operational proof
85+

Properties consolidated in a single hospitality deployment with clear ownership at each site.

12

Countries supported in a professional services network disclosure.

Customer evidence

Distributed operations. Governed disclosure.

Infrastructure for enterprise carbon governance.

Who we serve

Built for distributed enterprises

Mid-market and enterprise organizations with complex supplier networks and growing disclosure obligations.

  • Professional services groups

  • Hospitality operators

  • Property developers

  • Education networks

  • Multi-location service brands

Fig 4.A — Sectors served
Hospitality
28%
Prof. services
24%
Property dev.
19%
Education
16%
Multi-location
13%
0
10
20
30
Share of deployments (%)

Start with a free foundation audit

Map your data sources, reporting obligations, and governance gaps.

Get Started Now